There is little difficulty in a notion of conceptually placing one’s own language and the actions-in-the-outside world as happening simultaneously without the interference of hierarchical prejudice, such as bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, placed in relation to newspaper symbolization of real-outside event of what was real-outside-event, however those things may be unrelated outside-actions are to our behavior, there doesn’t have to appear a contradiction between the relation of one’s own language and outside events to be illogical.
None of this may alter outside events. However, these bubble-wrap slashes of grown up are events—that are also along with events in the outside.
The location of newspaper, as past, and present of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up can find themselves inhabiting beneath the ceiling, under the lid, of the same place.
Conceptions may alter oneself and being, and alter one’s sense of the outside. The individual instance occurs while self-reflection/ing, as:while, and also alongside, and being—in the act of; while also outside and whatever that is, is occurring, and one is outside of another event, regardless of how it is prioritized within the hierarchy of defining history.
Positing this stance on relation as a relation between and the outside as also an outside is not necessarily fanatical, it’s specific and individual—and isn’t the same as political action but could go along with it whenever.
This one long line is a mass of actions, a production of activity, in one line continually.
Now after that, we do not know what was happening, outside of that moment, except that this too is now a moment talking addressing what isn’t known outside of this one too.
There is only us at this moment, anything else, simply is not this: these are not these words, as the words read;
Nothing else outside of this.
And having read this, this doesn’t save anything or anyone. It does propose that the individual—who is with this—is in action, is within engagement, is action; present as en-presenting, unfolding, nowhere else as movement; alters you.
River and mountains of cities for a dam of pollution covering the body of the sky from which a (fish-airplane swim-flies and fades beneath the eye’s horizon), after: which is now, slumps back into an ordinary river, air, and land; cars, people in cars, buildings, people in buildings, and people walking down sidewalks.
To allow un-fixed conditions to result as imagined entities of exchange, as optical sight, as temporary phenomena and also imagined as generated from the insight for a need to subvert the illusion of fixed capitalistic-determination; to allow this, requires a space of leisure, a space not identified nor acknowledged by our country, a space that keeps a culture healthy, and its people happy.
The need for a demarcation of space, for transition, for acknowledging differences in phenomenological existences; death, as what has died, and that which is dying, too different stages, two different phenomenological existences, requires appropriate demarcations.
Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, is different than / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, and yet / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up becomes only what it is as different from bubble wrap slashes of grown up when no longer in the existence it was in, as indicated as / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, but bubble-wrap slashes of grown up remains in yet a 3rd space of which it has its own life not related to the first bubble-wrap slashes of grown up nor its difference of / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, but its own. Its own as outside the existence of those two differences, having an existence of its own, where it is alive in relevance to the cosmological force of its continual information as it appears and is perceived through the activity of this present-movement.
Though my friend is dead, the friend that is dead talks to me, but he is not my friend who died, the friend who died is gone, and yet my friend who died is who he is in the present, gone: but a liminal space of phenomenological complexity, an existence of life, talking to me (not in words but presence). I don’t miss him; I feel him present.
Will he die once everyone who knew him dies?
The relevance of cosmological difference as experienced within perception = information from other time-places that vitalize the nutrients for this.
Dogen’s theory: all times exist separately simultaneously.
What vitality is in occurrence now?
What vitality is in occurrence in relation to all spaces as existing at once here, that is different than without relevance of these differences? A difference of physical space, one is in, and mind-space of conceiving the space this is all happening in; interplay, liminal-interplay, limitational-interplay.
A kind of relation to others and the outside world, in the activity of perceiving this, is implied. Whatever plain of happening that is in occurrence with perception at this exact moment, is only what this is, and is happening simultaneous to other plains and times, all as unrelated actions to actions happening outside of this, as this mind phenomena of being right here with this changes the space this is for what it is to perceive it and change is now in occurrence in perception and physical reading-space as what it is which is only happening, right here, now, as an outside to some other unrelated activity somewhere else.
The mind and the body, different, sky and land are different. Beside each other.
A relation going on at every instant.
This as a unique space as different from reading this and perceiving this, but, bubble-wrap slashes of grown up / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up: where you are, here with whatever it is. A movement
that took you here that is taking you here now that is making an extension into a prolonged sensational unfolding of experience = present unfolding, duration of remaining in similar experience as a moment prior. Time in this is time of being alive, and this isn’t a movie.
Dreams can contain two impossibly existing things happening together; now this is a movie.
There is self-refection and language, and self-reflection never touches or exchanges with physical action in space—yet it makes reflective exchanges with physical action in space as an inclusion of experience. The whole thing of physical world and reflection happening at once. All of this read is occurring in the phenomena of mind, where all that is occurring is occurring within it, as also affecting yourself outside of it, and this is outside of what this is here within it, which enables a profound space; the liminal
bubble-wrap slashes of grown up
all part of the same place but different, all are of a different space, and different spaces can communicate between each other, if they are porous in perception enough, or have the relevance of cosmological experience available for receiving the vitality of particular information.
Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up
is a porous exchange in each difference of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up to / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up
paired structures as difference of sound as governed or implied by /
giving a sense of weight and lightness, shades of spacial interest.
Social-spheres: a dealing of relations and interactions between differences, including other different types of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, maybe / / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, etcetera.
Nature is us as in, we have self-reflection and language, yet nature and language are not the same, are outside of each other, except that we are nature to the degree that we experience the fact of it, not the conceptuality of it, and we are then nature-that-has-language.
Does all of nature have language, but we simply don’t experience it?
Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, a structure that is a relation and interaction between spheres in spatial apprehension, and so is / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up.
Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, contains characteristics of an affect with an implication of sound to the outside, not characteristics outside of it, only associational possibilities of its functional properties, addressing what bubble-wrap slashes of grown up relevantly addresses as found in the experience of reflecting upon it.
There is an occurrence in this, and in the duration of it: bubble-wrap slashes of grown up.
The outside of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up is the faculty of sensation/perception/cognition it conjures.
Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up contains no time but that which is before our eyes. What divisions are there here? Only an opening for a phenomenal space for one to exchange with.
Perhaps there are afterimages that now appear, a sense of things rolling up from behind the sequence of what is in occurrence as of occurrence itself, containing relevant shards of information, implying sound.
An accumulation opens and inhabits through continuance, bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, may appear to merge only separated by the appearance of another bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, apparently a new bubble-wrap slashes of grown up—or perhaps a reiteration as a list of times bubble-wrap slashes of grown up has appeared, as building apprehension-contents of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up itself.
Everything captured within itself, the same as our reading. A pressure of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, as structure for apprehension actions, into this, a structure becoming what is now later, as continuance through space, there are thousands of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up making an action, a thought, a color, a song. Mirroring: continuance; the exchange to the outside and the experience of what occurrence when here provides:
bubble-wrap slashes of grown up
/ bubble-wrap slashes of grown up
talk to each other, see that? There is a space open for communication at all points if identified.
Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up: a space allowing self-reflection to incorporate everything at once simultaneously. Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up produces what was/is becoming incorporated as what is ahead of this moment, grounded in a sound of what is unfolding—becoming what is ahead of itself—each bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, a string of horizon, without above or below or middle by recurrence of perception as the string which tends to the bubble-wrap slashes of grown up is a horizon created by whatever elsewhere it specifically with focus generates within the limitless, boundless space, of self-reflection.
Motions which cannot be mirrored in self-reflection as what is in occurrence in relation to the limitations of one’s seeing, bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, and remains not in people’s events, but in the specificity of this same-time occurrence; a sequence within the mind of individuality as coming apart and holding mind-formation simultaneously; all a gesture of sequence-experience, and to see this and to receive it as medicine, as nutrients to the relevance of the cosmological orientation one is currently in communication with; information.
Phenomena seeing phenomena.
Impermanence of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up as meltdown in acknowledgment of self-seeings’ ending, in the present. A kind of hologram in unfolding of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up as individual bubble-wrap slashes of grown up generate duration—nearly a duplication of intrusive similarities; DNA code, structures resembling each other but all creatures are diverse from each other. We are activity from outside in and from inside out simultaneously. It is as if outside is currently a hallucination of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up while bubble-wrap slashes of grown up inside is the clarity of what isn’t randomly seen; all now becomes luminous insight.
Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up now becomes a national report on global warming. The structure of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up contains an introduction, prologue, and a director’s note. There are interruptions, extensions and meditations which go before and between bubble-wrap slashes of grown up and / bubble-wrap slashes of grown up. These sections allow rest by variation in order to renew one’s apprehension for insight, and concentration. Another element of the structure of bubble-wrap slashes of grown up is the absence of footnoting, there are no indications of footnotes happening. The absent footnotes begin to extend longer than the original bubble-wrap slashes of grown up, and non-existent lengthy footnotes causes one to turn back to the bubble-wrap slashes of grown up of the connected non-existent footnote the previous bubble-wrap slashes of grown up had indicated, so that, there’s a need to remember which bubble-wrap slashes of grown up was left-off at, and reorient one’s apprehension, then turn back to the next moment or phrase in the non-existent footnote, turning ahead towards it, and so on. This active presence becomes sustained attention, a holding of sounds in an air of silence, an inevitable letting go and adjusting, allowing the original bubble-wrap slashes of grown up in motion as one’s attention on it becomes lost before one finds one’s way back to resuming bubble-wrap slashes of grown up again. Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up exchanges with a cause for an activity to hold onto a place in space as energy of comparing that place/sound/thought to other place/event/sound of occurrence; enlarges us. Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up becomes/became a transience of life in its reiteration, being itself as the sustained attention taking place. Bubble-wrap slashes of grown up is the imagination creating, simultaneously as life-form outside, all around us, and the outsides and insides collapse.